IX. Quantum Chemistry next up previous
Next: X. Mixed Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Up: No Title Previous: VIII. Free energy calculations

IX. Quantum Chemistry

For a general system of nuclei and electrons, the total Hamiltonian (in atomic units) is

eqnarray1273

tex2html_wrap_inline2936 : mass of nucleus I
tex2html_wrap_inline2940
-sum over pairs of electrons i and j separated by distance tex2html_wrap_inline2054
-electron-electron repulsion
tex2html_wrap_inline2948
-sum over nuclei I of charge tex2html_wrap_inline2952 and electrons i, where separation between nucleus I and electron i is given by tex2html_wrap_inline2960
-nuclear-electron attraction
tex2html_wrap_inline2962
-sum over pairs of nuclei I and J separated by distance tex2html_wrap_inline2968
-nuclear-nuclear repulsion
Born-Oppenheimer approximation: decouple electronic and nuclear motion
The Schrödinger equation for the electrons is

equation1311

where the electronic Hamiltonian tex2html_wrap_inline2970 is

equation1324


The nuclear Hamiltonian is

equation1336

Born-Oppenheimer approximation: nuclei move in the average field of the electrons
A. Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Methods
A. Szabo and N.S. Ostlund, Modern Quantum Chemistry, (McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, 1989).
Hartree-Fock theory is a way to solve for tex2html_wrap_inline1994 and tex2html_wrap_inline2974
Notation
-an electron is described by spatial coordinates tex2html_wrap_inline1978 and a spin coordinate tex2html_wrap_inline2978 (up or down)
-combine these 4 coordinates in the variable tex2html_wrap_inline2980
-for simplicity, write electronic wave function as tex2html_wrap_inline2982 (i.e. omit argument tex2html_wrap_inline1976 )
Antisymmetry principle (Pauli exclusion principle):
a many-electron wave function is antisymmetric with respect to the interchange of the coordinate tex2html_wrap_inline2980 of any two electrons
The simplest antisymmetric wave function that describes the ground state of an N-electron system is a single Slater determinant:
tex2html_wrap_inline2988
tex2html_wrap_inline2990 is a spin orbital and is a product of a spatial and a spin orbital
tex2html_wrap_inline2992
After some algebraic manipulations, we can show that

eqnarray1366

where

equation1375

equation1381

equation1388

Variational principle: minimize the energy tex2html_wrap_inline2994 subject to orthonormality constraint on spin orbitals

equation1400

The Hartree-Fock energy is an upper bound to the exact energy.
-Expand the spin orbitals in a basis set tex2html_wrap_inline2996

equation1408

(typically atom-centered Gaussian functions so that integrals can be calculated easily)
-Vary the coefficients to minimize the energy subject to the orthonormality constraint
This variational procedure leads to the Hartree-Fock equations

equation1414

where tex2html_wrap_inline2998 is the exchange operator, defined as

equation1426

This can be written as

equation1436

where

equation1441


Eliminate spin
RHF (restricted Hartree-Fock)
-all electrons paired
-each spatial orbital doubly occupied

equation1452

where

equation1457

The problem can be formulated as an eigenvalue equation ( Hartree-Fock-Roothaan equations)

equation1462


F: the Fock matrix tex2html_wrap_inline3000
S: overlap matrix tex2html_wrap_inline3002
C: the coefficient matrix (each column contains expansion coefficients for a molecular orbital)
tex2html_wrap_inline2064 : diagonal matrix of orbital energies tex2html_wrap_inline3008
SCF (self-consistent-field procedure) Since F depends on C, the eigenvalue equation must be solved self-consistently
Start with an initial guess for C
Repeat the following steps until convergence
1. calculate F(C)
2. derive a new C by solving the eigenvalue equation tex2html_wrap_inline3012
B. Correlation
the difference between the exact nonrelativistic energy and the Hartree-Fock energy in the limit of a complete basis set
Adding correlation to ab initio methods:
1. perturbation theory (i.e., MP2)
-total Hamiltonian is divided into two pieces
tex2html_wrap_inline3014 , which has known eigenfunctions and eigenvalues
V, which is a perturbation
-the exact energy is expressed as an infinite sum of contributions that will
converge if V is small
2. configuration interaction (CI)
-wave function is represented as a linear combination of N-electron trial functions
(i.e. N-electron Slater determinants)
-linear variational method is used to minimize the energy
3. other methods: coupled cluster, MCSCF
C. Semiempirical methods
approximate the integrals (or matrix elements) with analytical functions containing
parameters that are fit by comparing calculated information such as energy and geometry to experimental data
Advantages
-the integrals are faster to compute
-correlation can be included by fitting the parameters to experiment
Disadvantage
-the fitting procedure is subjective and not always accurate
Examples: MNDO, AM1
D. Density functional theory
T. Ziegler, Chem. Rev. 91, 651 (1991).
The energy of an electronic system can be expressed in terms of its density

equation1496

where the sum is over the N one-electron spatial orbitals tex2html_wrap_inline3020
The electronic energy of an N-electron system is (without approximation) is:

equation1502

tex2html_wrap_inline3022
-the exchange-correlation energy
-many different approximations have been used
Local density approximations (LDA): based on the homogeneous electron gas
Kohn-Sham equations for the 1-electron orbitals:

equation1526

tex2html_wrap_inline3024 is the exchange-correlation potential and is the functional derivative of tex2html_wrap_inline3022 :
tex2html_wrap_inline3028
Thus the DFT equations can be formulated similary to the Hartree-Fock equations, and the resulting eigenvalue equation can also be solved self-consistently.
For calculations on solids the basis functions are typically plane waves instead of Gaussian functions.
E. Valence bond theory
-wave function is represented by a linear combination of pure resonance structures (instead of individual nuclei and electrons)
-particularly useful for reactions where physical insight tex2html_wrap_inline1966 a small number of significant resonance structures
Examples:
1. Diatomic molecule HF
tex2html_wrap_inline3032 =HF (covalent)
tex2html_wrap_inline3034 =H tex2html_wrap_inline3036 F tex2html_wrap_inline3038 (ionic)
total wavefunction is a linear combination of these 2 resonance structures:
tex2html_wrap_inline3040
2. Simple proton transfer reaction
RXH + Y tex2html_wrap_inline1966 RX tex2html_wrap_inline3038 + HY tex2html_wrap_inline3036
tex2html_wrap_inline3032 =RXH Y:
tex2html_wrap_inline3034 =RX: tex2html_wrap_inline3038 HY tex2html_wrap_inline3036
tex2html_wrap_inline3056 =RX: tex2html_wrap_inline3038 H tex2html_wrap_inline3036 Y:
total wavefunction is a linear combination of these 3 resonance structures:
tex2html_wrap_inline3062
Energy is tex2html_wrap_inline3064
Variational principle tex2html_wrap_inline1966 minimize tex2html_wrap_inline2994
To obtain the coefficients C and the ground state energy, solve the equation
HC=SCe
H: Hamiltonian matrix with elements tex2html_wrap_inline3072
lowest eigenvalue is the ground state energy
Empirical valence bond (EVB) method
Arieh Warshel, Computer Modeling of Chemical Reactions in Enzymes and Solutions, (John Wiley tex2html_wrap_inline3074 Sons, Inc., New York, 1991)
-approximate matrix elements of H with empirical analytical functions
-assume overlap matrix S is the identity matrix (i.e. assume that effects of non-zero overlap integrals can be absorbed in parametrization of off-diagonal elements of H
tex2html_wrap_inline3076
tex2html_wrap_inline3078 : energy of resonance structure i in the gas phase
off-diagonal elements tex2html_wrap_inline3080 : coupling between the resonance structures i and j in gas phase


next up previous
Next: X. Mixed Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Up: No Title Previous: VIII. Free energy calculations

College of Science WWW Development
Tue Nov 26 09:48:20 EST 1996